God

If there were a hypothetical being which controlled all things, there would be no room for free will. Where we have free will, within that decision space allotted to us by God, there is no God. If I say to God, give me this, God does not answer. If I say to God, I would like to make an egg and cheese sandwich with a side of beans and tomatoes, and I'm going to go to the store and buy fresh tomatoes, basil, cheese, beans, eggs and bread. (and I actually go to the store) Then I will cook it for breakfast tomorrow. (and it's expecially good to add salt and pepper to the tomatoes and beans, cook in a pan. Regular canned beans, unless you have a pressure cooker, but that's a lot of work (and the beans taste the same either way)) Now I have earned the right to survive comfortably for the next 4 hours until I get hungry again. That reminds me, I need to go eat dinner and I'll work on this later when I come back.

If I build a control loop which only barely remains balanced and set it to maintain a task, it is beautiful to watch. The motors struggle, there is life in the machine then. If I optimize all the terms, the objective is achieved, the machine dies.

It has come to our attention that machines can be intelligent. Here is a hypothesis. The mechanism of thought will have dual history vectors \(A_i = \begin{bmatrix}a_0, a_1, \cdots, a_i \end{bmatrix}\) and \(B_i = \begin{bmatrix}b_0, b_1, \cdots, b_i \end{bmatrix}\) defining typical attention layers. Only there is no "self" attention, [1_08_24] we call it "dual" attention as the brain has two hemispheres not one. To achieve a finite recurrence of these history vectors it appears that "softmax" has to die, and all things become linear. Towards a recurrence relation which is more of a cycle than an update rule.

-Point4D Machine Intelligence Division